Quran: And hold firmly to the rope of Allah all together & do not become divided.(3/103) O you who have believed, fear Allah. & let every soul look to what it has put forth for tomorrow - & fear Allah. Indeed, Allah is Acquainted with what you do.(59/18) He decreed for you the same religion decreed for Noah, & what we inspired to you, & what we decreed for Abraham, Moses, & Jesus: "You shall uphold this one religion, & do not divide it."(42:13). The idol worshipers will greatly resent what you invite them to do. GOD redeems to Himself whomever He wills; He guides to Himself only those who totally submit.(42:14) Hadith: Make (Execute) For Allah, As Allah is watching you. Ummah Unity

Shariah Ruling on Addressing Yazid with “Radhi-Allahu Anhu”

Shariah Ruling on addressing Yazid with "Radhi-Allahu Anhu"

Shariah Ruling addressing Yazid with Radhi-Allahu Anhu The words “Radhi-Allahu-Anhu” meaning may Almighty-Allah be well pleased with him are used to signify Almighty-Allah’s pleasure. They are used as a form of respect to praise somebody. “Radhi-Allahu-Anhu” is used especially for the Companion & for those pure souls, whose hearts are filled with fear & awe of Almighty-Allah, as Almighty-Allah Most High ... Read More »

Punishment for the one who addresses Yazid as “Radhi-Allahu Anhu”

Punishment for who addresses Yazid as Radhi-Allahu Anhu

Punishment for who addresses Yazid as Radhi-Allahu Anhu The Just Caliph of the Clan of Ummayyah, Hadhrath ‘Umar bin Abdul ‘Aziz (May Almighty-Allah be well pleased with him) declared the person who addressed Yazid as “Radhi-Allahu-Anhu” as liable to be punished. This is written in “Tahdheeb-Ut-Tahdheeb”, the authoritative book on Rijal (the science of the classification of men, for the ... Read More »

The First and the Second interpretation of this Hadith

The First and Second interpretation of this Hadith

First interpretation of this Hadith In regard to this Hadith, the Hadith-Masters have given an opinion that the “city of Caesar” mentioned in the Hadith is not Constantinople, but Hims, which was the capital of Roman Empire in the days of the Prophet (Peace Be upon Him ). This city is presently in Syria & is called “Homs”. It is ... Read More »

First 32 Hijri & the Second Attack on Constantinople in 43 Hijri

1st and 2nd attack on Constantinople

First attack on Constantinople  It is written in Bidayah Wan Nihayah, Volume. 7, Page No. 179 about the first army which attacked Constantinople: Translation: Hadhrath Ameer Mu‘awiyah (May Almighty-Allah be well pleased with him) attacked Rome in 32 Hijri & fought battles upon battles till he reached the city of Constantinople. As given in Tarikh Kamil, Volume. 3, Page No. ... Read More »

The Third Attack on Constantinople Was In 44 Hijri Or 46 Hijri

The Third Attack on Constantinople Was In 44 Or 46 Hijri

Third attack on Constantinople The third attack on Constantinople was in 44 Hijri or 46 Hijri. It is mentione in Tarikh Kamil in the incidents of the year of 44 Hijri: Translation: In 44 Hijri Muslims with Hadhrath ‘Abdur Rahmaan bin Khalid bin Waleed (May Almighty-Allah be well pleased with them) entered Rome & spent the winter there itself & ... Read More »

Do You know In Which Siege Did Yazid Participate?

In Which Siege Did Yazid Participate?

In Which Siege Did Yazid Participate? To find out whether Yazid is included in the forgiveness given in the Hadith, it should be found in which attack of Constantinople did Yazid participate & in which year? There are four opinions about this. 1) He participated in the battle of Rome in 49 Hijri & he reached Constantinople as given in ... Read More »

The One simple Doubt and its Answer about Yazid

a doubt and its answer about yazid palid

A Doubt and its answer There can be a question about the Hadith of Sunan Abu Dawood that Hadhrath Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Almighty-Allah be well pleased with him) passed away in the battle which had been fought under Yazid, as given in Sahih Bukhari, Volume. 1, Page No. 158: Translation: Mahmood bin Rab‘ee says that I described this to ... Read More »

Yazid did not participate sincerely even in the later battles

Yazeed poked at the teeth of Imaam Hussain

Yazid did not participate sincerely even in the later battles History proves that even in the later battles, Yazid did not participate sincerely. Instead he participated only on the insistence of Hadhrath Ameer Mu’awiyah (May Almighty-Allah be well pleased with him) as given in Tarikh Kamil Volume. 3, Page No. 314, under the incidents of 49 & 50 Hijri: Translation: ... Read More »

A Question for the Supporters of Yazid ?

A Question for the Supporters of Yazid

A Question for the Supporters of Yazid Those people who support Yazid & claim that he participated in the siege of Constantinople & is therefore forgiven, even when the facts have been brought out can they bring forth any proof from the Quran or the Sunnah? Even if he had participated, will all his later sins be forgiven & Almighty-Allah ... Read More »